MS Windows/Virtual Appliance
Limitations for deploying on MS Windows
Altough Zoneminder´s interface is based on PHP and the system database uses MySQL, (both of which that may easily be deployed under Windows nowadays), the system core components (http://www.zoneminder.com/wiki/index.php/Main_Documentation#Components) are coded in Perl, and it´s structure is built considering a Linux traditional structure;
The new virtualization technologies available, on the other hand, may ecourage experiences of deploying the ZoneMinder system into a virtualized space under Windows; but then a first and strong limitation would be the capture device sharing;
Observing that most users deploy ZoneMinder systems using PCI (cheap or professional) capture devices, sharing the device among the host and the guest would be the first challenge to face; One first possibility that shows up then is the use of PCI PASS-TROUGH methods;
PCI PASS-TROUGH is a recent implementation for virtualization softwares that may share the capture device resources, or even assign it´s resources exclusively to the guest system; unfortunately, accomplishing that may not be an easy task; you may find below some web links that may help on better understanding the virtualization and pass-trough technics, but that would be interesting to think first about how usefull or how stable a Windows implementation would be;
A Much better, simpler, safer and more reliable solution, tough, would be forget the Windows implementation and use the available live cd ZoneMinder Distributions; they´re actively updated, and you may even experiment a full working ZoneMinder system without even changing one bit in your hard-disk;
For more information on ZoneMinder Live Cd distros, look for the ZoneMinder download page (http://www.zoneminder.com/downloads.html)
Pros and cons on the Windows Implementation
Pros
- Windows users may use their ZoneMinder Server side-by-side with a Windows OS; traditionally, dual boot implementations are used to have ZoneMinder in one partition (or entire disk) and Windows on another, so you can´t use both at the same time;
Cons
- Stability and safety: Windows safety implementations are known to be harder to maintain (arguable, tough);
- Permormance: sharing your operational system with another virtualized systems, besides it´s implementation efforts, will result in degraded overall performance; Using a dedicated surveillance system is far better and safer;
External references
- Virtualization: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtualization
- Pci Pass-trough: http://bitbud.com/2008/11/12/a-virtualization-first-from-kvm/
- Pci Pass-trough: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=974060
